Freecon

Where freedom and economics meet.

Saturday, November 02, 2002

ARMS FOR THE CHILDREN:

Suman Palit explains why gun education is more effective in de-mystifying guns for children than eliminating any talk about them whatsoever. I must agree wholeheartedly. If you believe what the Democrats say, ever single person (male?) is just one gun away from a murdererous rampage.

Friday, November 01, 2002

LEFT WING:

My commentary on the populist NBC hit "The West Wing" is belated because of work, but I had to get it out there all the same. I don't usually watch this program, primarily because I have a hard time distinguishing between it and the DNC platform. This past Wednesday, however, I decided to take a break and watch t.v. for awhile, and saw that The West Wing was getting ready to start. I thought maybe been too judgmental about the make-believe presidency and decided that I'd give the show another shot. I was wrong, of course. The West Wing is the kind of propaganda of which Stalin or Goebbels would have been proud.

Since I hadn't been following the show, I was forced to pay attention to the "scenes from last week" part. I realised pretty quickly that, like Law & Order, the story line pretty much follows the news. President Bartlett (Martin Sheen) is up for re-election and he has a debate to get prepared for. Now I was expecting there to be other good story lines that didn't have anything to do with politics, but that was a pipe dream. There is a perpetual litany of DNC dogma oozing out of every orifice during the show. Everything from why we need socialized medicine, to why we need government-controlled industry, to how socialism in general is the only true answer to all those nagging problems caused by selfish Republicans who are really only interested in getting rich off the backs of poor people and minorities. The best had to be when, during the debate, the Republican candidate, a rigid and burly fellow, delivers his canned responses only to have Bartlett fire back a witty response that sends his staff into fits of euphoria. We are expected to willfully suspend disbelief as Preident Bartlett scolds the evil Republican for thinking that Americans know what's better for themselves than the government does. This is of course such an incredibly one-sided debate that his staff decides that they won't even do any spinning afterwards, they'll just let Bartlett's incredibly cogent arguments and policy platforms stand for themselves. Yeah, right.

I really can't understand how anyone who isn't a leftist could enjoy such tripe. My wife, who is vehemently Republican and conservative, loves the show. I always ask her, "Do you recognize anyone in that show, or any other show on network t.v., that you feel like you identify with? Can you think of any character on any show that exhibits the same values and moral outlook that you have?" Her answer, predictably, is always "No, but that's just fiction. It's not real. It doesn't actually matter. Maybe you shouldn't watch that show anymore, it gets you too angry." This usually degenerates into "Your not the boss of me ... " and then I go to the other room to find a hockey game or something else that doesn't involve me being preached to.

But the fundamental question still exists: are there ANY characters on ANY t.v. show that accurately represent someone who isn't a leftist? I can't think of any. I can think of plenty of examples of the perfect Democrat or Green candidate. There are lots and lots of examples of characters who say all the right P.C. things and have all the requisite attitudes towards those who are "different" (i.e. morally equivalent -- or superior -- to any other point of view).

DAILY QUOTE:

"I have a fantasy where Ted Turner is elected President but refuses because he doesn't want to give up power."
- Arthur C. Clarke

Tuesday, October 29, 2002

THE 2ND AMENDMENT:

I haven't written too much on this subject, primarily because I find it best represented elsewhere. However, I am strongly in favor of enforcing the Second Amendment as written and not as some misguided, philanthropes would have you believe it should be "interpreted." It should be noted that I do not now, nor have I ever, owned a gun of any sort. I have certainly fired many, and I am fond of shooting skeet on occassion. But by and large I am not around guns nor do I have any grand desire to be. Even though I live in Virginia, few of my friends own guns and only one is a member of the NRA. Nevertheless, I believe strongly -- scratch that; I KNOW that I have and every other law-abiding citizen has the right to own guns and that this right is fundamental to the protection of liberty. As T.J. said:

"No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the
people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to
protect themselves against the tyranny in government."

--Thomas Jefferson


or how about ...

And what country can
preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned from time to time,
that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The
remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What
signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be
refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is
its natural manure."

-- Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787, letter to William S. Smith, see
Jefferson On Democracy, 20 (S. Padover ed. 1939).


and if that's not enough try ...

"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms (within his own lands or tenements)."
-- Thomas Jefferson: Draft Virginia Constitution (with his note added), 1776. Papers 1:353 ."


and ...

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither
inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for
the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage
than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater
confidence than an armed man."

--Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria


While the veracity of some of these quotes may be questionable (see this critique) in my mind it's pretty clear what the intent of the Second Amendment was and what it still is. Some people say that in modern times we have no serious fear of a despotic government suddenly rearing its ugly head such that we would seriously need arms to protect ourselves from it. To them I quote David Hume: "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." Keep in mind that these are the same people that are constantly trying to give more power to the government.

So why I am speaking up about the Second Amendment now? Well I've recently come across some excellent sites that I've added to my blog bar roll, such as Rachel Lucas, The Ville, and FlashBunny, all of which center on the right to bear arms. I also flt like expessing my personal view on the subject. In addition, one of the new additions (FlashBunny) led me to this very well written parable. Enjoy!


DAILY QUOTE:

An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.
- Robert A. Heinlein

Monday, October 28, 2002

FLASHBACK:

Recently Radley Balko put together an excellent list of songs with libertarian themes, all of which were great selections. As is usual in such cases, suggestions came out of the woodwork in droves, and frankly most of them were excellent. Also as usual in these situations, I didn't come up with my own suggestion until the game was over, the place was cleaned up and I was picking day-old popcorn and peanuts out of my hair. Nevertheless, this morning I woke up with a song in my head that I couldn't quite think of all the words to, but I distinctly remembered "He can't even run his own life, I'll be damned if he'll run mine." I wasn't sure if this was about freedom or not, but the part I could remember seemed pretty good. So I went here (cool place) and came up with ... "Sunshine" by Jonathan Edwards. As it turned out, this is all about freedom, although I think in the context of the Vietnam War. Regardless, the lyrics speak for themselves:

Sunshine go away today
I don't feel much like dancin'
Some man's come he's tryin' to run my life
I don't believe what he's askin'
Well he tells me I'd better get in line
I can't hear what he's sayin'
When I grow up I'm gonna make it mine
These ain't the dues I've been payin'


Well how much does it cost
I'll buy it
The time is all we've lost
I'll try it
He can't even run his own life
I'll be damned if he'll run mine...(sunshine)


Sunshine go away today
I don't feel much like dancin'
Some man's come he's trying to run my life
I don't believe what he's askin'


O.K., up until this point I wasn't sure if this song conveyed the sort of libertarian ideas that I ascribe to. The part about someone (government) trying to run my life without being able to handle their own affairs rang pretty true. As did the very capitalist "how much does it (freedom?) cost, I'll buy it." But it was the next set of lyrics that sold me:

Working starts to make me wonder where
The fruits of what I do are goin'
He says in love and war all is fair
But he's got cards he ain't showin'


Well how much does it cost
I'll buy it
The time is all we've lost
I'll try it
He can't even run his own life
I'll damned if he'll run mine...(sunshine)


Sunshine come on back another day
Pretty soon I'll be singin'
This ole world she's gonna turn around
Brand new bells will be ringin'


The last part I think seals the deal by talking about new bells ringing -- of freedom possibly? like the Liberty Bell, perhaps? Well, I'll let you be the judge.


DAILY QUOTE:

Character is higher than intellect. A great soul will be strong to live as well as think.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson